Legal Opinion

McNeely v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1972No. 10934-PRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Vice Chief Justice.

This is a petition for review of a decision and opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One, Department B, which affirmed a finding and award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona denying benefits to the surviving wife and children of Billy W. McNeely.

We are called upon to determine whether the Industrial Commission of Arizona may deny compensation where it is found that even though the work contributed to the injury that the contribution was “not material.”

The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. The deceased, Billy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Revles v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Waller v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Compensation Fund v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  2. DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Allen v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Pearce Development v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API