Baar v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is an action to quiet title. The plaintiff named as defendants F. M. Smith, his wife, West End Consolidated Mining Company, Mercantile Trust Company and several other persons. The defendants appeared and answered and a trial was had before the trial court sitting without a jury. The trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and from a judgment entered thereon the defendants appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The judgment appealed from contained many provisions. After it was rendered, on an application for a writ of supersedeas, the supreme court decided…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Adams v. HackettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Cadwalader v. NashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. BlickleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Russell v. SoldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Katz v. KarlssonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.