Legal Opinion

Odell v. Cox

California Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1907No. L.A. No. 1758PublishedCited by 47 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

On August 5, 1901, in an action for damages pending in the superior court of Los Angeles County, defendant Cox recovered judgment against plaintiff Odell for $480.65, and $103.35 costs. One John E. Daly was the attorney for Cox in the bringing of said action, and has ever since continued to act as attorney for Cox therein, although another attorney has been associated with him. A motion for a new trial was regularly made by Odell. On October 15, 1902, the motion for new trial was heard and ordered denied. On November 12, 1902, Odell served and filed his notice of appeal from said order, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Schroeder v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Smith v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Mayberry v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Connick v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Golden v. TomiyasuNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Res. Grp., LLC v. Nev. Ass'n Servs., Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Rauer v. HertweckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API