Legal Opinion
Katz v. Karlsson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1948No. Civ. 13502PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is an appeal from an order vacating, annulling and setting aside a final decree of divorce. The motion to vacate was made upon an “affidavit of said defendant and cross-complainant, David Karlsson, . . . and upon all the pleadings, records, papers, files and judgments entered and filed in said action.” In addition the testimony of defendant and his attorney was introduced.
Louise Luellah Karlsson and David Karlsson were married in November, 1925. In January of 1931, the parties separated and the husband commenced an action (No. 224936, Superior Court of the City and County of San…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Godfrey v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Hendricks v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Young v. the Young Holdings Corp., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. BladeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Moriarty v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Radich v. KrulyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Blackman v. KristovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.