Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1949No. 11963PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

On October 15, 1947, the appellant, United States of America, to be referred to as “the Government”, as plaintiff, instituted an action against Herbert A. Jones, Jr., the appellant, as defendant, in which it sought to set aside and rescind a sale of certain surplus materials to Jones, made on October 30, 1946. The Complaint stated a single claim or cause of action, — mutual mistake. On December 4, 1947, an amended Complaint was filed which added to the causes of action of the original Complaint three others, (1) unilateral mistake, (2) lack of authority of the agents…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Turney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. United States v. George Anderson Bowen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  3. Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  4. Clive Charles Thomas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Graham v. Atchison. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API