Legal Opinion

Nordin v. Kuno

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 18, 1980No. 49516PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

By a complaint dated October 29, 1976, the Nordins brought suit against the Kunos claiming adverse possession of a gravel driveway on the Kuno property or, in the alternative, a prescriptive easement to use the driveway. On April 18,1978, the Washington County District Court ruled that the Nordins own a permanent prescriptive easement in the gravel driveway for purposes of ingress and egress to their store. The court further enjoined the defendants and their successors from erecting any barriers to prevent that usage by plaintiffs. In response to defendants’ motion for amended…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dozier v. KrmpotichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Alstad v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Collins v. ColleranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Merrick v. SchleuderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Hartman v. Blanding's Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Swift v. KniffenAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ebenhoh v. HodgmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Block v. SextonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Matthews v. DennisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Wheeler v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API