Legal Opinion

Merrick v. Schleuder

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 1930No. 27,523PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Tried without a jury, this action (for an injunction to prevent interference with an easement claimed by plaintiffs over land be-. longing to defendants) resulted in a decision for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

The easement, which plaintiffs claim by prescription, is across a vacant piece of ground substantially 22 feet square in the rear of a store building owned by them in block 29 in the city of Austin. Plaintiffs’ building is in about the middle of the block and faces west on Main street. It is 71% feet long and 22 wide. Defendants own…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Swan v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Perrin v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  4. Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  5. McKenzie v. ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Dozier v. KrmpotichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Moore v. HenricksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Alstad v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Hartman v. Blanding's Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API