Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Dennis

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 2005No. 4010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Gloria and Alton Dennis (“Defendants”) appeal the special referee’s determination that their property was subject to an easement in favor of adjoining property owned by Ruby E. Matthews, Bobby J. Matthews, and David McCoy (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”). Specifically, the special referee found Plaintiffs established their right to an easement under the theories of prescription and necessity. We affirm. 1

FACTS

Gloria Dennis and Ruby Matthews are first cousins. In 1946, Otis McKnight, who was Gloria’s father and Ruby’s uncle, built a home place on a tract of land that he owned in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Horry County v. LaychurSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Jowers v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Cope v. CopeMontana Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Slear v. HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frierson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Kelley v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Paine Gayle Properties, LLC v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Crystal Pines Homeowners Ass'n v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. James L. Braswell, Sr. v. James F. Amick (2)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API