Legal Opinion

Alstad v. Boyer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 22, 1949No. 34,819PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment enjoining defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s use of a driveway and requiring defendant to remove an obstruction placed thereon.

Plaintiff and defendant own adjoining residential properties in Cloquet, Minnesota, described as lots 8 and 9, block 1, Nelson’s Addition. Plaintiff, Clarence Alstad, owns and occupies lot 9, which lies south of defendant’s, John Boyer, lot 8. Both lots front on H street and face east. A concrete paved driveway extends from H street toward the rear of the lots along the boundary line between the premises of the parties.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Jacobs v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. Schmidt v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Village of Newport v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Dalton v. Real Estate & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Berg v. CarlstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Dunbar v. HeinrichWashington Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API