Gale v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
This action was commenced by Stuart E. Gale as a taxpayer against defendants, city of St. Paul and Linwood Stone Products Company, hereafter referred to as Linwood. Plaintiff sought to have a contract awarded by the city to Linwood declared illegal and to enjoin and restrain defendants from entering into or performing the contract. A temporary restraining order was issued. The district court found in favor of defendants and denied plaintiffs alternative motion for amended findings or for a new trial. This appeal is from that order.
Pursuant to St. Paul City Charter,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Duffy v. Village of PrincetonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Rochon Corp. v. City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Transit Team, Inc. v. Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.