Legal Opinion

Gale v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1959No. 37,617PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

This action was commenced by Stuart E. Gale as a taxpayer against defendants, city of St. Paul and Linwood Stone Products Company, hereafter referred to as Linwood. Plaintiff sought to have a contract awarded by the city to Linwood declared illegal and to enjoin and restrain defendants from entering into or performing the contract. A temporary restraining order was issued. The district court found in favor of defendants and denied plaintiffs alternative motion for amended findings or for a new trial. This appeal is from that order.

Pursuant to St. Paul City Charter,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Duffy v. Village of PrincetonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Rochon Corp. v. City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Transit Team, Inc. v. Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API