Legal Opinion
Duffy v. Village of Princeton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1953No. 36,057PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from an amended judgment of the district court whereby it was determined in substance that all action taken by the defendant members of the public utilities commission of the village of Princeton was in accordance with the provisions of the statutes of the state of Minnesota with respect to public contracts.
On December 26, 1951, the public utilities commission of Princeton, referred to hereinafter as the commission, retained G. M. Orr Engineering Company to prepare plans and specifications for a Diesel generating unit for its municipal power plant. The plans…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Davies v. Village of MadeliaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Rice v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- City of Bemidji v. ErvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gostovich v. City of West RichlandWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Gridley v. EngelhartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Telephone Associates, Inc. v. St. Louis County BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Foley Brothers, Inc. v. MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Otter Tail Power Company v. MacKichanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.