Legal Opinion
Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 21, 1989No. C4-88-2383PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
L.J. IRVINE, Judge.
Respondent City of Minneapolis awarded a construction contract for an improvements project to C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc., a respondent in this case. Appellant Carl Bolander & Sons Co., the second lowest bidder on the project, sought injunc-tive relief to prevent the performance of the contract, or, in the alternative, a declaratory judgment to invalidate the contract because the bid was nonresponsive by failing to name a women-owned business enterprise. The trial court denied the injunction and determined the contract was valid and enforceable. We reverse and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Northeast Construction Co. v. RomneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 174, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9886 Rossetti Contracting Company, Inc. v. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, and Environmental Protection Agency, Defedants-Appellants, and John McElwain President, Board of Trustees, Hinsdalesanitary District, Dupage County, and Hinsdale Sanitarydistrict,dupage County, and Loitz Brothers Construction Co., Inc.,interveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Carl Corp. v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Danzl v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re Carl Corp. v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 1997