Legal Opinion

Estate of Doe v. Department of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 11, 2004No. SC 16840PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the workers’ compensation review board (board) properly affirmed the determination by the workers’ compensation commissioner for the fourth district (commissioner) that the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is not an occupational disease2 for certain *755correction officers employed by the defendant, the department of correction, and, therefore, the notice of claim filed by the plaintiff, the estate of John Doe, the decedent, was not subject to the extended three year limitation period set forth in General Statutes § 31-294c3 for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Toro v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Ricigliano v. Ideal Forging Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. GAMEZ-REYES v. BiagiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Arborio v. Windham Police DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API