Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff is a linotype operator. After serving an apprenticeship, he had worked at his trade more than three and one-half years when he entered the employ of the named defendant, hereafter referred to as the defendant. After working a few months, he developed, in July, 1939, a dermatitis. He continued his employment until October 26th following, but then became incapacitated and now claims workmen’s compensation. The commissioner made an award in his favor; the defendant and his insurer appealed but the Superior Court dismissed the appeal; and from that judgment they have appealed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Reynolds v. Land Mortgage & Title Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Madeo v. I. Dibner & Brother, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Bober v. Independent Plating Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Hansen v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.