Legal Opinion

Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 14, 1942PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff is a linotype operator. After serving an apprenticeship, he had worked at his trade more than three and one-half years when he entered the employ of the named defendant, hereafter referred to as the defendant. After working a few months, he developed, in July, 1939, a dermatitis. He continued his employment until October 26th following, but then became incapacitated and now claims workmen’s compensation. The commissioner made an award in his favor; the defendant and his insurer appealed but the Superior Court dismissed the appeal; and from that judgment they have appealed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Reynolds v. Land Mortgage & Title Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Madeo v. I. Dibner & Brother, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. KriseOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bober v. Independent Plating Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Hansen v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API