Legal Opinion

Ricigliano v. Ideal Forging Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 26, 2006No. SC 17597PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The issue we must decide in this appeal is when the limitations period under General Statutes § 31-294c (a) 1 commences for filing a workers’ compen sation claim for an occupational disease if a claimant is diagnosed with a disease but has no knowledge of the causal connection between the disease and workplace exposure until some later point in time. The plaintiff, Joan Ricigliano, appeals from the decision of the compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the sixth district (commissioner) granting the defendants’ 2…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Gartrell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Greco v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Green v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Fredette v. Connecticut Air National GuardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. FernandesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Churchville v. Bruce R. Daly Mechanical ContractorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API