Kreling v. McMullen
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
The complaint alleged the making of a promissory note to the firm of Smith & Stevens payable in monthly installments, that the note was secured by a chattel mortgage upon certain property consisting of furniture, carpets, pictures, and other household effects, that the firm of Smith & Stevens duly sold and assigned the said note with the said mortgage to plaintiffs and that plaintiffs thereupon became and ever since have been the owners and holders thereof. A copy of the mortgage is attached to the complaint and made a part of it. A breach of the contract entitling plaintiffs to foreclose is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cockrill v. ClymaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Fernandez v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Farmers and Merchants Bank v. CopseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- A & B METAL PRODUCTS v. MacArthur Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Garcia v. GalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Paulekas v. PaulekasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Kester Motors, Inc. v. HaddadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952