Legal Opinion

Kreling v. McMullen

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1910No. S.F. No. 5122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The complaint alleged the making of a promissory note to the firm of Smith & Stevens payable in monthly installments, that the note was secured by a chattel mortgage upon certain property consisting of furniture, carpets, pictures, and other household effects, that the firm of Smith & Stevens duly sold and assigned the said note with the said mortgage to plaintiffs and that plaintiffs thereupon became and ever since have been the owners and holders thereof. A copy of the mortgage is attached to the complaint and made a part of it. A breach of the contract entitling plaintiffs to foreclose is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cockrill v. ClymaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Fernandez v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Farmers and Merchants Bank v. CopseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A & B METAL PRODUCTS v. MacArthur Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Garcia v. GalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Paulekas v. PaulekasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Kester Motors, Inc. v. HaddadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API