Cockrill v. Clyma
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Sutter County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
— Action in the nature of trover to recover damages for the conversion, by the defendants, of certain cattle.
In the original complaint, filed November 23, 1891, the plaintiff described herself as executrix of the will of Christopher Cockrill, deceased, who, she alleges, died on January 6, 1891, and whose will was probated and letters testamentary issued to her on January 31, 1891.
The canse of action alleged is: That on May 4, 1891, “the *124plaintiff, as such executrix, was the owner and in the possession of” the cattle described, of the value of $1,268; that on that day the “…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Parker v. AltschulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by12 opinions
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Kelly v. LiddicoatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Halpern v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Richard v. RichardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Calhoun v. HildebrandtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.