Legal Opinion

Paulekas v. Paulekas

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1953No. Civ. 18674PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

In this action for separate maintenance, appellant was by the judgment required to pay monthly to his wife for the support of herself and two children $175; also, bills for their medical and dental care. Additionally, she was awarded the home, the movable property where the couple had lived and the savings bank accounts in her name.

On receipt of notice of the decree, appellant moved promptly under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the several defaults that had been entered against him and the judgment on the grounds of his inadvertence, surprise and excusable neglect. He…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Morton v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Kettelle v. KettelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Garcia v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Mulkey v. MulkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bailey v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Murray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Davis v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API