Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Tormey

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1898No. S. F. No. 858PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County and from an order denying a new trial. Joseph P. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, C.

Suit to foreclose a mortgage executed to Bernardo Fernandez, the plaintiff, by defendant Patrick Tormey, on August 23, 1893. At that time the Union Stock Yard Company of San Francisco, a corporation, was indebted to Fernandez, in the sum of $50,742.12, to fall due, with accruing interest, on August 28, 1893; which indebtedness was evidenced by the-promissory note of a certain third person, a mortgage of lands-securing the same, and a contract in writing whereby said corporation had assumed and agreed to pay the amount unpaid on said note to Fernandez, and he had released the original…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Elder v. KutnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McArthur v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Osborne v. EndicottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Sampson v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Haber v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alberts v. American Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Ohio Electric Car Co. v. Le SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Terry v. Southwestern Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API