Farmers and Merchants Bank v. Copsey
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendants appeal from the judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial.
The facts are substantially as follows: In October, 1892, one William H. Beckman conveyed certain real estate to defendant Fred Copsey. At the time of the conveyance, the premises were encumbered by a mortgage given by said William H. Beckman to one Henry Beckman to secure a promissory note for the sum of $4,357, and, by the terms of the conveyance, the said Fred Copsey assumed and agreed to pay the said note and mortgage so made by said William H. to Henry Beckman.
Prior to June 17, 1895, the said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McArthur v. MageeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Frese v. Mutual Life Insurance of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Bowman v. SearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Corn Belt Bank v. FormanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932
- Kreling v. McMullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.