Legal Opinion

Kester Motors, Inc. v. Haddad

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1952No. Civ. 4346PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

A complaint in 13 separate causes of action was filed on January 15, 1951, by plaintiff corporation against defendants for money claimed to be due it. The first count is predicated upon a memorandum of agreement between the parties whereby Mrs. George A. Haddad agreed to pay plaintiff $100 per week, commencing November 4, 1950, until $9,754.33 had been paid. This amount was for cars purchased by her from plaintiff. A promissory note in the same amount and for like payments was executed in connection therewith. It was alleged that $800 was due thereon. The second cause of action was predicated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Ingrim v. EppersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. A & B METAL PRODUCTS v. MacArthur Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Winter v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Barry v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Osborn v. OsbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Schreiber v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API