Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Blackwell Oil & Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The plaintiff in error, who hereinafter will be referred to either as the plaintiff or as the oil company, commenced this action against the defendant in error, who hereinafter will be referred to either as the defendant or as the gas company, for the purpose of obtaining a decree adjudging the oil company to be entitled to all of the drip gasoline theretofore and thereafter caught in a gasoline drip' installed in the operation of what is known as the Martin Well No. 2. The value of the product to April, 1926, was said to be $78,185.68.
Under date of August 4, 1916, the owners of certain real…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Mussellem v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- George v. CurtainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Smith v. Pulaski Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Wilson v. King Smith Ref. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Seber v. Spring Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1940
- Tilley v. Allied Materials CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Roy v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.