Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District. Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by the Hammett. Oil ' Company against the Gypsy Oil Company for accounting of oil and gas profits. . Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
In October, 1906, the owners of certain land in Creek county executed an oil and gas lease thereon in consideration of a royalty of % of the oil delivered in the pipe line and $250 for gas wells when the gas was sold off the premises. The lease contained the further provision authorizing the lessee to sublease and release any part of the land. By mesne assignments, the lease was transferred to Mr. Hammett, who executed a sublease, containing a recital that the lease was subject to all the requirements, conditions, and stipulations contained in the original lease and conveyed all rights,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hunter v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Withington v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Wolf v. Blackwell Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Wemple v. Producers' Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
3Cited by44 opinions
- Reynolds v. McMan Oil & Gas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Northern Natural Gas Company v. GroundsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1968
- Cole v. Industrial Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Ludey v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.