Legal Opinion

Roy v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 30, 1942No. 36060PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The lessor instituted this action to have forfeited and cancelled from the public records an oil and gas lease on the ground that the lessee and sublessee refused to pay the royalties alleged to be due him in accordance with the terms of the lease. In the alternative, the plaintiff asked for an accounting covering the alleged balance of the royalties said to be due under the lease from the operation of four gas wells by the lessee and two oil wells by the sub-lessee on the premises. The defendants denied that the plaintiff was- entitled to the claimed additional royalties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wall v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Tyson v. Surf Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Wilkins v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Wemple v. Producers' Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  5. Coyle v. Louisiana Gas & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Undercofler v. Colonial Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Barton W. Freeland v. Sun Oil Company and Cities Service Oil Company Sohio Petroleum Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API