Wilson v. King Smith Ref. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, O.
The plaintiffs in error were plaintiff’s and the defendant in error was defendant in the trial court. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.
On October 24, 1912, the plaintiffs were the owners of certain land in Creek county, and on that date they executed an oil and gas mining lease thereon to the Scott-Wilson Company, and thereafter the said lease was duly assigned to various parties, and the defendant, the King Smith Refining Company, became the owner of said oil and gas mining lease by assignment, and it was in possession of said property…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chicot County v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Mussellem v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ConnelleeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. StineTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. PoeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Seber v. Spring Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.