Moore v. San Vicente Lumber Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendant, San Vicente Lumber Company, operates a saw-mill upon land owned by it in the county of Santa Cruz. In connection with its mill it maintains a pond which it has created by the construction of a dam iipon its land.
The plaintiff is the owner of adjoining lands, of which a part lie immediately below the dam. This action was brought to enjoin the maintenance of the pond, and to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been occasioned by it and by a breaking of the dam to plaintiff’s land. Trial was had before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. The court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Kyle v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hughes v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gavin v. GavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Todd v. CochellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by13 opinions
- Farrell v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Bottoms v. Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.