Bottoms v. Madera Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Action to recover the sum óf $176,000 alleged to he due the plaintiffs from the defendant for services rendered by the plaintiff for the uses and purposes of the defendant. The defendant had judgment and the plaintiffs appeal.
The record shows the existence of the Madera Irrigation District organized and existing under and by virtue of the act commonly referred to as the Wright-Bridgford Act (Stats. 1897, p. 254), and the acts amendatory thereof and supplemental thereto,' that prior to the tenth day of July, 1922, the qualified voters of the Madera Irrigation District had voted bonds in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Egan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Arthur v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Chester v. CarmichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Chase v. City Treasurer of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. All Parties & PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Department of Fish & Game v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Allen v. HusseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Lertora v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.