Legal Opinion
Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 1937No. Civ. 1669PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
Plaintiff, as lessee of certain land under an oil and gas lease in the Signal Hill Field, instituted this action on July 13, 1934, to enjoin defendants from continuing the drilling of an oil well known as Hines No. 1 well which was alleged to have been located approximately 60 feet west from the southwest corner of plaintiff’s lease and which in the process of drilling deviated from the vertical and entered and trespassed upon plaintiff’s lease. Plaintiff’s lessors were permitted to intervene in the action and complaints in intervention were filed by them whereby substantially the same relief…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Koppikus v. State Capitol Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Farrell v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Superior Construction Co. v. ElmoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Connell v. BowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- I. H. P. Corp. v. 210 Central Park South Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- Glusman v. LiebermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.