Legal Opinion
Tindall v. Hardin
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 18, 1972No. Civ. A. 71-847PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUMBAULD, District Judge.
Legal scholars have often observed, that both in the Roman law and common law systems, the remedy or specific type of action historically came first. Not until later did legal philosophers analyze and classify the types of substantive rights recognized by the law, and endeavor to devise appropriate remedies to enforce them. In the more advanced and sophisticated stage of legal development, with primary emphasis upon the substantive rights, the maxim ubi jus ibi remedium was formulated. 1
Adherence to this maxim has often resulted in judges finding themselves…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Illinois Ex Rel. McCollum v. Board of Ed. of School Dist. No. 71, Champaign Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Doe v. WohlgemuthDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Bermudez v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Philadelphia Welfare Rights Organization Ex Rel. Brookins v. O'BannonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Gray v. International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- Stewart v. ButzDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.