Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Welfare Rights Organization Ex Rel. Brookins v. O'Bannon

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1981No. Civ. A. 81-4369PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.

I. Factual Background

Earlier this year, Congress amended the Food Stamp Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2011-2027, in two respects by enacting the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, Pub.L. No.97-35, 95 Stat. 357 (1981). First, the standard deduction for a household’s earned income work expenses was reduced from twenty percent to eighteen percent. Second, the Omnibus Act converted the eligibility test for food stamps from a 100% of the poverty line net income test to a 130% of the poverty line gross income test.

Pennsylvania intends to implement these changes…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Earl v. Butz, Individually, and as Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  5. Vargas v. TrainorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Coleman v. BlockDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1984
  2. Elizabeth Lebeau v. Thomas Spirito, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  3. Ortiz v. EichlerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  4. Karen Foggs v. John R. Block, Thomas Spirito, Etc., Karen Foggs v. John R. BlockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  5. Ortiz v. EichlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API