Legal Opinion

Treadway v. Western Cotton Oil & Ginning Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1932No. Civil No. 3150PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

L. C. Treadway and Mary P. Treadway, his wife, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought suit against the defendants herein, Western Cotton Oil and Ginning Company, a corporation, and Phoenix Sales and Investment Company, a corporation, hereinafter more particularly designated respectively as the oil company and the sales company, to recover the sum of $4,380 alleged by plaintiffs to be due from the defendants as installments on a certain contract between plaintiffs and the sales company, which was hy the latter assigned to the oil company. Apparently the sales company did not defend the action,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  2. National Bank v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Wilcoxson v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Langel v. BetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Estate of Franklin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  2. Richard W. Bosse v. Crowell Collier and MacMillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Irwin v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Association v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Norton v. First Federal SavingsArizona Supreme Court · 1981

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API