Legal Opinion
Norton v. First Federal Savings
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1981No. 14685PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Justice:
Plaintiffs/appellants entered into agreements on July 21, 1974, to purchase from Clyde Hutcheson three subdivision lots in Pinecrest Terrace Unit Six in the City of Flagstaff. As required by city ordinance, Hutcheson had posted a performance bond on August 7, 1973, with First Federal Savings as surety, to guarantee construction of off-site improvements on these lots. Following several extensions granted Hutcheson to perform on the bond, plaintiffs filed a complaint against Hutcheson and the City of Flagstaff seeking damages and a writ of mandamus compelling the City of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Employer's Liability Assurance Corporation v. LuntArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Irwin v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Treadway v. Western Cotton Oil & Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lonsdale v. ChesterfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Stratton v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Franko v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Sherman v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.