Legal Opinion

Richard W. Bosse v. Crowell Collier and MacMillan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1977No. 75-1298PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*605CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge:

This is a certified interlocutory appeal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) from the district court’s order dismissing seven of plaintiffs’ nine claims for relief alleged in their complaint. Accepting as true the allegations in the complaint, as we must, the relevant facts of record are as follows.

Plaintiffs are former officers, directors and controlling shareholders of Coinart Corporation [Coinart], a manufacturer of musical instruments, mainly saxophones. C. G. Conn, Ltd. [Conn], a manufacturer and retailer of musical instruments, was acquired in 1969 by defendant Crowell…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Semegen v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Paul Bender, George and Diane Decarlo v. Southland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Schreiber Distributing Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API