Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Association v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Justice.
¶ 1 We consider today whether a home-builder who is not also the vendor of the residence can be sued by a buyer for breach of the implied warranty of workmanship and habitability. We conclude that absence of contractual privity does not bar such a suit.
I
¶2 William Mahoney and The Lofts at Fillmore, L.L.C. (collectively, “the Developer”) contracted with Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc. (“Reliance”) to convert a building owned by the Developer into condominiums. The Developer later sold condominium units to individual buyers, who formed The Lofts at Fillmore…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Richards v. Powercraft Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Woodward v. Chirco Const. Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Treadway v. Western Cotton Oil & Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- John sullivan/susan Sullivan v. Pulte Home CorpArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Luana Savings Bank v. Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. and United Building CentersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.