Legal Opinion

Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Association v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 2008No. CV-07-0416-PRPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Justice.

¶ 1 We consider today whether a home-builder who is not also the vendor of the residence can be sued by a buyer for breach of the implied warranty of workmanship and habitability. We conclude that absence of contractual privity does not bar such a suit.

I

¶2 William Mahoney and The Lofts at Fillmore, L.L.C. (collectively, “the Developer”) contracted with Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc. (“Reliance”) to convert a building owned by the Developer into condominiums. The Developer later sold condominium units to individual buyers, who formed The Lofts at Fillmore…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Richards v. Powercraft Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Woodward v. Chirco Const. Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Treadway v. Western Cotton Oil & Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. John sullivan/susan Sullivan v. Pulte Home CorpArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Luana Savings Bank v. Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. and United Building CentersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API