Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Corrugating Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

Sec. 102.09, sub. (5), par. (h), Stats. 1925, provides:

“Where injury is caused by the failure of the employer to comply with any statute of the state or any lawful order of *416the industrial commission, compensation and death benefits as provided in sedtions 102.03 to 102.34, inclusive, shall be increased fifteen per cent.”

Order No. 27 of General Orders on Safety provides:

“Order 27- — Drop hammers. All drop hammers used on work which requires the operator to place his hand beneath the hammer when he places the part in position, must be guarded.”

In the General Orders on Safety the commission has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. McManus v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  3. McCarthy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Moose v. VeseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Dept. of Transp. v. Transp. Comm.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Simmons Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API