Legal Opinion

Tewes v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 8, 1927:

Rosenberry, J.

The sole question presented here is whether or not there is evidence sufficient to sustain the finding of the Industrial Commission that the deceased employees were at the time they met their death performing services growing out of and incidental to their employment. Workmen’s Compensation Act, sub. (2), sec. 102.03.

It is undisputed that if they were not performing service growing out of and incidental to their employment the master is not liable under the workmen’s compensation act. Radtke Bros. & Korsch Co. v. Rutzinski, 174…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoenig v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ellis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Radtke Bros. & Korsch Co. v. RutzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Lewis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wm. Esser & Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Sullivan v. Suffolk Peanut Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  3. Andreski v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Medina v. New Mexico Consolidated Min. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Bowen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API