Legal Opinion

Barber v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1942PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The question in this case is whether the death of plaintiff's husband by suicide is compensable under the circumstances. This presents a question of proximate cause. There is some difference of opinion between plaintiff and defendants as to whether we are here faced with a question of fact or law, but in any event, we shall state the facts which are necessary to an understanding and determination of the question.

Deceased was an employee of the engineering company, and was injured on April 3, 1939, by falling astride a hopper in the course of his employment. He sustained a rupture of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Daniels v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. McFarland v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Ruschetti's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Petty v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Harper v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Brenne v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API