Legal Opinion

Fehrer v. Midland Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinions were filed December 5, 1922:

Crownhart, J.

The defense of suicide is strongly and ably urged by counsel for. the defendant. The law is well settled, based on human experience, that there is a strong presumption against suicide. The love of life and the immorality of taking one’s own life turn the mind against suicide. So it is that when suicide is alleged in defense the burden is on the defendant to establish such fact. In such a case, where the evidence is wholly circumstantial, as in this case, every other reasonable hypothesis to account for the death must be excluded…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Home Benefit Assn. v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Stephenson v. Bankers Life Ass'n of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Arneberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Krogh v. Modern Brotherwood of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Urian v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Carter v. Standard Acc. Ins.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wiger v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Spence v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Olson v. Herman Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API