Zschock v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Rebutting the presumption of legitimacy. The record contains substantial credible evidence tending to prove that Albert was the father of Gail and Susan. The testimony of their mother and the birth records have been mentioned, and the latter are made presumptive evidence by sec. 328.09 (1), Stats. See also sec. 327.18 (1). There was evidence tending to show that Albert considered himself the father. Lucy’s testimony as to his sending money and gifts of clothing has been mentioned; that he sent clothing at holidays and birthdays, and inclosed cards marked “Dad” was corroborated by Helen…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- M. & M. Realty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Simmons Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Waunakee Canning Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Johnson v. MetcalfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schuh v. Fox River Tractor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Commercial Discount Corp. v. Milwaukee Western BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Westerman v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Frew v. Dupons Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.