Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 1976No. 45619PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Chief Justice.

Appeal from a conviction in a trial de novo in district court, wherein a $25 fine was levied and defendant, Kennon N. Harris, was required to pay part of the costs of prosecution pursuant to Minn. St. 633.23.

*396Harris was originally convicted in Ramsey County Municipal Court of violating St. Paul’s unreasonable acceleration ordinance, St. Paul Legislative Code, § 134.01 (5).1 He appealed, and a jury trial de novo was held pursuant to Minn. St. 488.20 and 488A.27, subd. 6, with the result stated above.2 In his appeal to this court, Harris challenges the constitutionality of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Colten v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  5. State v. GoldstoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. DeVereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. DomkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API