Legal Opinion
State v. Suess
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1952No. 35,575, 35,576PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Defendants, Andrew J. Suess and W. H. Berkner, were each charged by separate informations filed by the county attorney of Morrison county with a violation of M. S. A. 100.29, subd. 10, making it unlawful—
“to throw or cast the rays of a spotlight, headlight, or other artificial light on any highway, or in any field, woodland, or forest, for the purpose of spotting, locating or taking any wild animal, except raccoons when treed with the aid of dogs, while having in possession or under control, either singly or as one of a group of persons, any firearm dr other…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. WurzbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Pharr v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MORETTISupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- County of Dakota v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.