Legal Opinion
State v. Domke
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 26, 1986No. CO-86-626Published
1Opinion of the Court
*646OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Appellant was arrested for accelerating with an unnecessary display of speed in violation of a Rochester ordinance. He moved that the charges be dismissed because the ordinance was unconstitutionally vague. The trial court granted the motion and the state appeals. We reverse.
FACTS
On November 29, 1984, respondent Steven James Domke was arrested for unnecessary display of speed, in violation of a Rochester ordinance which states
No person shall start or accelerate any motor vehicle with unnecessary exhibition of speed on any public or private way. Prima facie evidence of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State v. Northwest Poultry & Egg Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976