Legal Opinion

King v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1989No. 88-297PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Ike King was convicted by a jury of aggravated assault and battery as proscribed by Wyo.Stat. § 6-2-502(a)(ii) (1977). On appeal, he presents numerous *945contentions of error in the proceedings below relating to the conduct of the prosecutor and the jury, the introduction of certain evidence, the assessment of various costs upon him as part of his sentence, the propriety of a jury instruction, and the failure to grant a new trial.

We affirm but modify the judgment and sentence with respect to costs.

The specific issues raised by appellant, as rephrased in the form of…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PadillasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mazurek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API