Legal Opinion

Robert Camel Contracting, Inc. v. Krautscheid

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2006No. 00CV0545MA; A124244PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

In this breach of contract action, plaintiff appeals from the supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to defendants, and defendants cross-appeal. Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in utilizing the “net judgment” approach in determining that defendants were the sole prevailing party, and should have determined who the prevailing party was on a claim-by-claim basis. On cross-appeal, defendants argue that the trial court erred in reducing its award of attorney fees. We agree with plaintiff. Accordingly, we reverse and remand on the appeal, and dismiss the cross-appeal as moot.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Wilkes v. ZurlindenOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Premier West Bank v. GSA WHOLESALE, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Mindful Insights, LLC v. VerifyValid, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Beggs v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. Rodriguez-BarreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API