Wilkes v. Zurlinden
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
In this action on a construction contract, the issue is whether the trial court erred in designating defendants as the prevailing party under ORS 20.096 1 and awarding them attorney fees under the parties’ contract. After a trial in which it denied affirmative relief to both plaintiff 2 and defendants, the court designated only defendants as the prevailing party. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that neither party was the prevailing party. Wilkes v. Zurlinden, 146 Or App 371, 932 P2d 584, vac’d and rent’d 325 Or 489, 940 P2d 518 (1997), on remand 152 Or App 130, 952 P2d 569 (1998). For…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Anderson v. Jensen Racing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Allco Enterprises Inc. v. Goldstein Family Living TrustCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Brennan v. La Tourelle ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Foster v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Mindful Insights, LLC v. VerifyValid, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.