Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Blumenstein
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1982No. CA 18864, SC 28259PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
The parties entered into a contract containing a provision that “the losing party agrees to pay to the successful party” reasonable attorney fees to be fixed by the court. The plaintiffs’ complaint for damages for breach of contract was met with a counterclaim for damages for breach of the same contract. The trial court found for plaintiffs on some of their claims and for defendants on some of their claims. The judgment concluded as follows:
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that:
“Plaintiffs are awarded judgment against the defendants in the sum of $2,727.04, plus interest at the rate of 6…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- McMillan v. GoldenOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Jewell v. Triple B. Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- UNITED STATES NAT. BANK OF OREGON v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Miller v. Safeco Title Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Daily Gazette Co. v. West Virginia Development OfficeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. Love It Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Anderson v. Jensen Racing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Wilkes v. ZurlindenOregon Supreme Court · 1999
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.