Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hoss

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1929PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a suit to enjoin the issuance and payment of certain warrants covering incidental expenses of members of the legislature. After an appropriation by legislative act (chap. 207, General Laws of Oregon for 1929) providing for the' payment of the general expenses of the legislature, the following House Concurrent Eesolution was passed:

“That the secretary of state is hereby authorized and directed to audit and allow, in the same manner as other claims against the appropriation made for the payment of the expenses incurred by the thirty-fifth legislative assembly of the state of Oregon, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peay v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Banker v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Payne v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. McCoy v. HandlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Dixon v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hall v. BlanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Todd v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Gallarno v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API