Peay v. Nolan
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook
The Legislature of 1927 appropriated $750' as expenses to each member of the General Assembly and directed the Treasurer to pay it. The complainant, as a. citizen and taxpayer, filed the bill ag’ainst the Treasurer and Comptroller of the Treasury to enjoin the payment of the appropriation. The Chancellor sustained the defendants ’ motion to dissolve the injunction and dismiss the bill and complainant appealed.
Through complainant’s assignments of error it is insisted:
First, that Article 2, Section 23 of the Constitution, which prescribes the compensation of members of the General Assembly, by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
- Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Standard Oil Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Condon v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Richardson v. Tennessee Board of DentistryTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BoboTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Hall v. BlanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Todd v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.