Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Payne v. Reeves

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1921No. File No. 4975PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Original proceeding 'by the iS-tate of -South Dakota, on the relation of Byron S. Payne, Attorney General, against Jay Reeves as State Auditor of the State of South Dakota, to restrain and prohibit defendant from drawing and issuing warrants on the State Treasurer for purposes therein specified; the petition consisting of five parts, each relating to a separate special proceeding; “Part One” relating to an expense allowance of $150.00 per month, to Samuel C. Polley, John…

Read the full summary

Original proceeding 'by the iS-tate of -South Dakota, on the relation of Byron S. Payne, Attorney General, against Jay Reeves as State Auditor of the State of South Dakota, to restrain and prohibit defendant from drawing and issuing warrants on the State Treasurer for purposes therein specified; the petition consisting of five parts, each relating to a separate special proceeding; “Part One” relating to an expense allowance of $150.00 per month, to Samuel C. Polley, John Howard Gates,t Charles S. Whiting, Ellison G. Smith, and' James H. McCoy, as Judges of the Supreme Court of the State of…

1Opinion of the CourtOrvts, J.

This is an original proceeding commenced in the Supreme Court by the plaintiff, state of South Dakota, on the relation of Byron S. Payne, its Attorney General, seeking to restrain and prohibit the defendant, Jay Reeves, as Auditor of said state, from drawing and issuing warrants on the State Treasurer for purposes hereinafter stated.

Plaintiff’s petition consists of five parts, numbered from. I to V, both inclusive, each relating to a separate special proceeding.

“Part I” relates to an expense allowance of $150 per month to each of the Supreme Court judges; “Part II” to an expense allowance of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. State v. BeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People Ex Rel. Kemmler v. . DurstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. State ex rel. Weldon v. ThomasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  5. McCoy v. HandlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Earhart v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Eberle v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. South Dakota Automobile Club, Inc. v. VolkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Dixon v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API