Dixon v. Shaw
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBranson, C. J.
January 21, 1927, this court sustained a motion filed by the plaintiffs herein, praying it to exercise its original jurisdiction, under section 2, article 7, of the Constitution, and that it permit to be filed, and that the court entertain their petition for, a peremptory writ of mandamus. Thereupon the petition was filed. Its allegations are made by J. W. Dixon and others, about 60 members of the House of Representatives of the Eleventh Legislature of the state of Oklahoma,., now in regular biennial session (section 27, art. 5, of the Constitution), as plaintiffs. The writ is sought against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sharpless v. Mayor of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Terrell v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- State ex rel. Payne v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- McCoy v. HandlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Ashton v. FergusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State Ex Rel. York v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Ogden v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Tate v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Hall v. BlanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Todd v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.